“Retired diplomat” Dan “Invade Syria? Insane” Simpson.
He says:
It wouldn’t take much U.S. military force to get rid of Mr. Mugabe in Zimbabwe or to block off the generals in Myanmar from the stricken area, but we have no excess military capacity. If we weren’t in Iraq, it is conceivable that America could lead the international community in putting an end to the ability of Mr. Mugabe and the Myanmar generals to torment their populations.–Toledo Blade column.
That’s a target-rich paragraph from the retired diplomat. (That’s how he’s identified at the end of every column. It’s a funny moniker, since you’d figure a diplomat is always a diplomat–or at least diplomatic enough even in “retirement” to earn the name. Maybe not quite like a Marine never being a former Marine, but close enough in the diplomatic world.) If only the warmongers weren’t busy putting an end to the ability of Saddam and the Iraqi leadership to torment their populations, we could have put an end to the ability of Mr. Mugabe et cetera et cetera. If only we weren’t over there fighting the war you want to fight, we could be over here fighting the war I want to fight. But the war I want to fight isn’t in Syria, either, because that would be insane. It’s in Myanmar, or quite possibly Mugabe’s Zimbabwe, or wherever else I say.
Also: “It wouldn’t take much U.S. military force to get rid of Mr. Mugabe….” Contrasted with this from three years ago: “A decision to invade Syria is not a decision for Mr. Bush, heading a beleaguered administration, to make for us on his own.” I’m a tad confused. Maybe “U.S. military force” isn’t the kind of thing you should say when you’re trying to emphasize that we shouldn’t use this force without the consent of the international community. I don’t know. Maybe I would understand if I, too, were a retired diplomat.
Squirrelly Madeleine, also a retired diplomat, pontificated on this as well; one of these retired diplomats copied the other’s work. Whichever direction that happened, Madeleine sure squirreled up her version before it went to print:
A decade ago, when Myanmar was allowed to join the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, I was assured by leaders in the region that they would push the junta to open its economy and move in the direction of democracy. With a few honorable exceptions, this hasn’t happened.
So it’s her fault that Myanmar is letting its own citizens die. Except it isn’t her fault, because she can always blame George W. Bush instead:
The invasion of Iraq, with the administration’s grandiose rhetoric about pre-emption, was another matter, however. It generated a negative reaction that has weakened support for cross-border interventions even for worthy purposes. Governments, especially in the developing world, are now determined to preserve the principle of sovereignty, even when the human costs of doing so are high.
Thus, Myanmar’s leaders have been shielded from the repercussions of their outrageous actions. Sudan has been able to dictate the terms of multinational operations inside Darfur. The government of Zimbabwe may yet succeed in stealing a presidential election.
Dan: you forgot to blame Sudan on George W. Bush! Ten points off.
Evidently, everything in Sudan, Myanmar, and Zimbabwe was just fine when the two of you weren’t retired. I seem to recall otherwise, but I’m not a retired….
Anyway. Madeleine’s completely off the reservation and approaching Carter Country, I fear. And not the fun one starring Victor French. Imagine if a so-called neo-con held forth on the need for “cross-border interventions.” I thought the Left railed against Bush’s Empire and our current penchant for bullying the world and demanding our own way. And intervening wherever we feel like it.
Question for Madam Secretary: if cross-border interventions are the way to go, and if they were legitimate when you were in two very high foreign-policy roles in the Clinton Administration during which nearly one million were killed in Rwanda….
Madeleine has me so frustrated and flummoxed by her article that I don’t have a good ending here. And, while I shouldn’t be too frivolous after mentioning the Rwandan Genocide, I would note that Victor French looks a little like Saddam Hussein.